背景
在分层的代码架构中,层与层之间的对象避免不了要做很多转换、赋值等操作,这些操作重复且繁琐,于是乎催生出很多工具来优雅,高效地完成这个操作,有BeanUtils、BeanCopier、Dozer、Orika等等,本文将讲述上面几个工具的使用、性能对比及原理分析。
性能分析
其实这几个工具要做的事情很简单,而且在使用上也是类似的,所以我觉得先给大家看看性能分析的对比结果,让大家有一个大概的认识。我是使用JMH来做性能分析的,代码如下:
要复制的对象比较简单,包含了一些基本类型;有一次warmup,因为一些工具是需要“预编译”和做缓存的,这样做对比才会比较客观;分别复制1000、10000、100000个对象,这是比较常用数量级了吧。
@BenchmarkMode(Mode.AverageTime)@OutputTimeUnit(TimeUnit.MICROSECONDS)@Fork(1)@Warmup(iterations = 1)@State(Scope.Benchmark)public class BeanMapperBenchmark {@Param({"1000", "10000", "100000"})private int times;private int time;private static MapperFactory mapperFactory;private static Mapper mapper;static {mapperFactory = new DefaultMapperFactory.Builder().build();mapperFactory.classMap(SourceVO.class, TargetVO.class).byDefault().register();mapper = DozerBeanMapperBuilder.create().withMappingBuilder(new BeanMappingBuilder() {@Overrideprotected void configure() {mapping(SourceVO.class, TargetVO.class).fields("fullName", "name").exclude("in");}}).build();}public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {Options options = new OptionsBuilder().include(BeanMapperBenchmark.class.getName()).measurementIterations(3).build();new Runner(options).run();}@Setuppublic void prepare() {this.time = times;}@Benchmarkpublic void springBeanUtilTest(){SourceVO sourceVO = getSourceVO();for(int i = 0; i < time; i++){TargetVO targetVO = new TargetVO();BeanUtils.copyProperties(sourceVO, targetVO);}}@Benchmarkpublic void apacheBeanUtilTest() throws Exception{SourceVO sourceVO = getSourceVO();for(int i = 0; i < time; i++){TargetVO targetVO = new TargetVO();org.apache.commons.beanutils.BeanUtils.copyProperties(targetVO, sourceVO);}}@Benchmarkpublic void beanCopierTest(){SourceVO sourceVO = getSourceVO();for(int i = 0; i < time; i++){TargetVO targetVO = new TargetVO();BeanCopier bc = BeanCopier.create(SourceVO.class, TargetVO.class, false);bc.copy(sourceVO, targetVO, null);}}@Benchmarkpublic void dozerTest(){SourceVO sourceVO = getSourceVO();for(int i = 0; i < time; i++){TargetVO map = mapper.map(sourceVO, TargetVO.class);}}@Benchmarkpublic void orikaTest(){SourceVO sourceVO = getSourceVO();for(int i = 0; i < time; i++){MapperFacade mapper = mapperFactory.getMapperFacade();TargetVO map = mapper.map(sourceVO, TargetVO.class);}}private SourceVO getSourceVO(){SourceVO sourceVO = new SourceVO();sourceVO.setP1(1);sourceVO.setP2(2L);sourceVO.setP3(new Integer(3).byteValue());sourceVO.setDate1(new Date());sourceVO.setPattr1("1");sourceVO.setIn(new SourceVO.Inner(1));sourceVO.setFullName("alben");return sourceVO;}}
在我macbook下运行后的结果如下:
Score表示的是平均运行时间,单位是微秒。从执行效率来看,可以看出 beanCopier > orika > springBeanUtil > dozer > apacheBeanUtil。这样的结果跟它们各自的实现原理有很大的关系,
下面将详细每个工具的使用及实现原理。
Spring的BeanUtils
使用
这个工具可能是大家日常使用最多的,因为是Spring自带的,使用也简单:BeanUtils.copyProperties(sourceVO, targetVO);
原理
Spring BeanUtils的实现原理也比较简答,就是通过Java的Introspector获取到两个类的PropertyDescriptor,对比两个属性具有相同的名字和类型,如果是,则进行赋值(通过ReadMethod获取值,通过WriteMethod赋值),否则忽略。
为了提高性能Spring对BeanInfo和PropertyDescriptor进行了缓存。
(源码基于:org.springframework:spring-beans:4.3.9.RELEASE)
/*** Copy the property values of the given source bean into the given target bean.* <p>Note: The source and target classes do not have to match or even be derived* from each other, as long as the properties match. Any bean properties that the* source bean exposes but the target bean does not will silently be ignored.* @param source the source bean* @param target the target bean* @param editable the class (or interface) to restrict property setting to* @param ignoreProperties array of property names to ignore* @throws BeansException if the copying failed* @see BeanWrapper*/private static void copyProperties(Object source, Object target, Class<?> editable, String... ignoreProperties)throws BeansException {Assert.notNull(source, "Source must not be null");Assert.notNull(target, "Target must not be null");Class<?> actualEditable = target.getClass();if (editable != null) {if (!editable.isInstance(target)) {throw new IllegalArgumentException("Target class [" + target.getClass().getName() +"] not assignable to Editable class [" + editable.getName() + "]");}actualEditable = editable;}//获取target类的属性(有缓存)PropertyDescriptor[] targetPds = getPropertyDescriptors(actualEditable);List<String> ignoreList = (ignoreProperties != null ? Arrays.asList(ignoreProperties) : null);for (PropertyDescriptor targetPd : targetPds) {Method writeMethod = targetPd.getWriteMethod();if (writeMethod != null && (ignoreList == null || !ignoreList.contains(targetPd.getName()))) {//获取source类的属性(有缓存)PropertyDescriptor sourcePd = getPropertyDescriptor(source.getClass(), targetPd.getName());if (sourcePd != null) {Method readMethod = sourcePd.getReadMethod();if (readMethod != null &&//判断target的setter方法入参和source的getter方法返回类型是否一致ClassUtils.isAssignable(writeMethod.getParameterTypes()[0], readMethod.getReturnType())) {try {if (!Modifier.isPublic(readMethod.getDeclaringClass().getModifiers())) {readMethod.setAccessible(true);}//获取源值Object value = readMethod.invoke(source);if (!Modifier.isPublic(writeMethod.getDeclaringClass().getModifiers())) {writeMethod.setAccessible(true);}//赋值到targetwriteMethod.invoke(target, value);}catch (Throwable ex) {throw new FatalBeanException("Could not copy property '" + targetPd.getName() + "' from source to target", ex);}}}}}}
小结
Spring BeanUtils的实现就是这么简洁,这也是它性能比较高的原因。
不过,过于简洁就失去了灵活性和可扩展性了,Spring BeanUtils的使用限制也比较明显,要求类属性的名字和类型一致,这点在使用时要注意。
Apache的BeanUtils
使用
Apache的BeanUtils和Spring的BeanUtils的使用是一样的:
BeanUtils.copyProperties(targetVO, sourceVO);
原理
Apache的BeanUtils的实现原理跟Spring的BeanUtils一样,也是主要通过Java的Introspector机制获取到类的属性来进行赋值操作,对BeanInfo和PropertyDescriptor同样有缓存,但是Apache BeanUtils加了一些不那么使用的特性(包括支持Map类型、支持自定义的DynaBean类型、支持属性名的表达式等等)在里面,使得性能相对Spring的BeanUtils来说有所下降。
(源码基于:commons-beanutils:commons-beanutils:1.9.3)
public void copyProperties(final Object dest, final Object orig)throws IllegalAccessException, InvocationTargetException {if (dest == null) {throw new IllegalArgumentException("No destination bean specified");}if (orig == null) {throw new IllegalArgumentException("No origin bean specified");}if (log.isDebugEnabled()) {log.debug("BeanUtils.copyProperties(" + dest + ", " +orig + ")");}// Apache Common自定义的DynaBeanif (orig instanceof DynaBean) {final DynaProperty[] origDescriptors =((DynaBean) orig).getDynaClass().getDynaProperties();for (DynaProperty origDescriptor : origDescriptors) {final String name = origDescriptor.getName();// Need to check isReadable() for WrapDynaBean// (see Jira issue# BEANUTILS-61)if (getPropertyUtils().isReadable(orig, name) &&getPropertyUtils().isWriteable(dest, name)) {final Object value = ((DynaBean) orig).get(name);copyProperty(dest, name, value);}}// Map类型} else if (orig instanceof Map) {@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")final// Map properties are always of type <String, Object>Map<String, Object> propMap = (Map<String, Object>) orig;for (final Map.Entry<String, Object> entry : propMap.entrySet()) {final String name = entry.getKey();if (getPropertyUtils().isWriteable(dest, name)) {copyProperty(dest, name, entry.getValue());}}// 标准的JavaBean} else {final PropertyDescriptor[] origDescriptors =//获取PropertyDescriptorgetPropertyUtils().getPropertyDescriptors(orig);for (PropertyDescriptor origDescriptor : origDescriptors) {final String name = origDescriptor.getName();if ("class".equals(name)) {continue; // No point in trying to set an object's class}//是否可读和可写if (getPropertyUtils().isReadable(orig, name) &&getPropertyUtils().isWriteable(dest, name)) {try {//获取源值final Object value =getPropertyUtils().getSimpleProperty(orig, name);//赋值操作copyProperty(dest, name, value);} catch (final NoSuchMethodException e) {// Should not happen}}}}}
小结
Apache BeanUtils的实现跟Spring BeanUtils总体上类似,但是性能却低很多,这个可以从上面性能比较看出来。阿里的Java规范是不建议使用的。
另外,关注公众号Java核心技术,在后台回复:手册,可以获取最新阿里的 Java 开发手册。
BeanCopier
使用
BeanCopier在cglib包里,它的使用也比较简单:
@Testpublic void beanCopierSimpleTest() {SourceVO sourceVO = getSourceVO();log.info("source={}", GsonUtil.toJson(sourceVO));TargetVO targetVO = new TargetVO();BeanCopier bc = BeanCopier.create(SourceVO.class, TargetVO.class, false);bc.copy(sourceVO, targetVO, null);log.info("target={}", GsonUtil.toJson(targetVO));}
只需要预先定义好要转换的source类和target类就好了,可以选择是否使用Converter,这个下面会说到。
在上面的性能测试中,BeanCopier是所有中表现最好的,那么我们分析一下它的实现原理。
原理
BeanCopier的实现原理跟BeanUtils截然不同,它不是利用反射对属性进行赋值,而是直接使用cglib来生成带有的get/set方法的class类,然后执行。由于是直接生成字节码执行,所以BeanCopier的性能接近手写
get/set。
BeanCopier.create方法
public static BeanCopier create(Class source, Class target, boolean useConverter) {Generator gen = new Generator();gen.setSource(source);gen.setTarget(target);gen.setUseConverter(useConverter);return gen.create();}public BeanCopier create() {Object key = KEY_FACTORY.newInstance(source.getName(), target.getName(), useConverter);return (BeanCopier)super.create(key);}
这里的意思是用KEY_FACTORY创建一个BeanCopier出来,然后调用create方法来生成字节码。
KEY_FACTORY其实就是用cglib通过BeanCopierKey接口生成出来的一个类
private static final BeanCopierKey KEY_FACTORY = (BeanCopierKey)KeyFactory.create(BeanCopierKey.class);interface BeanCopierKey {public Object newInstance(String source, String target, boolean useConverter);}
通过设置
System.setProperty(DebuggingClassWriter.DEBUG_LOCATION_PROPERTY, "path");
可以让cglib输出生成类的class文件,我们可以反编译看看里面的代码
下面是KEY_FACTORY的类
public class BeanCopier$BeanCopierKey$$KeyFactoryByCGLIB$$f32401fd extends KeyFactory implements BeanCopierKey {private final String FIELD_0;private final String FIELD_1;private final boolean FIELD_2;public BeanCopier$BeanCopierKey$$KeyFactoryByCGLIB$$f32401fd() {}public Object newInstance(String var1, String var2, boolean var3) {return new BeanCopier$BeanCopierKey$$KeyFactoryByCGLIB$$f32401fd(var1, var2, var3);}public BeanCopier$BeanCopierKey$$KeyFactoryByCGLIB$$f32401fd(String var1, String var2, boolean var3) {this.FIELD_0 = var1;this.FIELD_1 = var2;this.FIELD_2 = var3;}//省去hashCode等方法。。。}
继续跟踪Generator.create方法,由于Generator是继承AbstractClassGenerator,这个AbstractClassGenerator是cglib用来生成字节码的一个模板类,Generator的super.create其实调用AbstractClassGenerator的create方法,最终会调用到Generator的模板方法generateClass方法,我们不去细究AbstractClassGenerator的细节,重点看generateClass。
这个是一个生成java类的方法,理解起来就好像我们平时写代码一样。
public void generateClass(ClassVisitor v) {Type sourceType = Type.getType(source);Type targetType = Type.getType(target);ClassEmitter ce = new ClassEmitter(v);//开始“写”类,这里有修饰符、类名、父类等信息ce.begin_class(Constants.V1_2,Constants.ACC_PUBLIC,getClassName(),BEAN_COPIER,null,Constants.SOURCE_FILE);//没有构造方法EmitUtils.null_constructor(ce);//开始“写”一个方法,方法名是copyCodeEmitter e = ce.begin_method(Constants.ACC_PUBLIC, COPY, null);//通过Introspector获取source类和target类的PropertyDescriptorPropertyDescriptor[] getters = ReflectUtils.getBeanGetters(source);PropertyDescriptor[] setters = ReflectUtils.getBeanSetters(target);Map names = new HashMap();for (int i = 0; i < getters.length; i++) {names.put(getters[i].getName(), getters[i]);}Local targetLocal = e.make_local();Local sourceLocal = e.make_local();if (useConverter) {e.load_arg(1);e.checkcast(targetType);e.store_local(targetLocal);e.load_arg(0);e.checkcast(sourceType);e.store_local(sourceLocal);} else {e.load_arg(1);e.checkcast(targetType);e.load_arg(0);e.checkcast(sourceType);}//通过属性名来生成转换的代码//以setter作为遍历for (int i = 0; i < setters.length; i++) {PropertyDescriptor setter = setters[i];//根据setter的name获取getterPropertyDescriptor getter = (PropertyDescriptor)names.get(setter.getName());if (getter != null) {//获取读写方法MethodInfo read = ReflectUtils.getMethodInfo(getter.getReadMethod());MethodInfo write = ReflectUtils.getMethodInfo(setter.getWriteMethod());//如果用了useConverter,则进行下面的拼装代码方式if (useConverter) {Type setterType = write.getSignature().getArgumentTypes()[0];e.load_local(targetLocal);e.load_arg(2);e.load_local(sourceLocal);e.invoke(read);e.box(read.getSignature().getReturnType());EmitUtils.load_class(e, setterType);e.push(write.getSignature().getName());e.invoke_interface(CONVERTER, CONVERT);e.unbox_or_zero(setterType);e.invoke(write);//compatible用来判断getter和setter是否类型一致} else if (compatible(getter, setter)) {e.dup2();e.invoke(read);e.invoke(write);}}}e.return_value();e.end_method();ce.end_class();}private static boolean compatible(PropertyDescriptor getter, PropertyDescriptor setter) {// TODO: allow automatic widening conversions?return setter.getPropertyType().isAssignableFrom(getter.getPropertyType());}即使没有使用过cglib也能读懂生成代码的流程吧,我们看看没有使用useConverter的情况下生成的代码:public class Object$$BeanCopierByCGLIB$$d1d970c8 extends BeanCopier {public Object$$BeanCopierByCGLIB$$d1d970c8() {}public void copy(Object var1, Object var2, Converter var3) {TargetVO var10000 = (TargetVO)var2;SourceVO var10001 = (SourceVO)var1;var10000.setDate1(((SourceVO)var1).getDate1());var10000.setIn(var10001.getIn());var10000.setListData(var10001.getListData());var10000.setMapData(var10001.getMapData());var10000.setP1(var10001.getP1());var10000.setP2(var10001.getP2());var10000.setP3(var10001.getP3());var10000.setPattr1(var10001.getPattr1());}}
在对比上面生成代码的代码是不是阔然开朗了。
再看看使用useConverter的情况:
public class Object$$BeanCopierByCGLIB$$d1d970c7 extends BeanCopier {private static final Class CGLIB$load_class$java$2Eutil$2EDate;private static final Class CGLIB$load_class$beanmapper_compare$2Evo$2ESourceVO$24Inner;private static final Class CGLIB$load_class$java$2Eutil$2EList;private static final Class CGLIB$load_class$java$2Eutil$2EMap;private static final Class CGLIB$load_class$java$2Elang$2EInteger;private static final Class CGLIB$load_class$java$2Elang$2ELong;private static final Class CGLIB$load_class$java$2Elang$2EByte;private static final Class CGLIB$load_class$java$2Elang$2EString;public Object$$BeanCopierByCGLIB$$d1d970c7() {}public void copy(Object var1, Object var2, Converter var3) {TargetVO var4 = (TargetVO)var2;SourceVO var5 = (SourceVO)var1;var4.setDate1((Date)var3.convert(var5.getDate1(), CGLIB$load_class$java$2Eutil$2EDate, "setDate1"));var4.setIn((Inner)var3.convert(var5.getIn(), CGLIB$load_class$beanmapper_compare$2Evo$2ESourceVO$24Inner, "setIn"));var4.setListData((List)var3.convert(var5.getListData(), CGLIB$load_class$java$2Eutil$2EList, "setListData"));var4.setMapData((Map)var3.convert(var5.getMapData(), CGLIB$load_class$java$2Eutil$2EMap, "setMapData"));var4.setP1((Integer)var3.convert(var5.getP1(), CGLIB$load_class$java$2Elang$2EInteger, "setP1"));var4.setP2((Long)var3.convert(var5.getP2(), CGLIB$load_class$java$2Elang$2ELong, "setP2"));var4.setP3((Byte)var3.convert(var5.getP3(), CGLIB$load_class$java$2Elang$2EByte, "setP3"));var4.setPattr1((String)var3.convert(var5.getPattr1(), CGLIB$load_class$java$2Elang$2EString, "setPattr1"));var4.setSeq((Long)var3.convert(var5.getSeq(), CGLIB$load_class$java$2Elang$2ELong, "setSeq"));}static void CGLIB$STATICHOOK1() {CGLIB$load_class$java$2Eutil$2EDate = Class.forName("java.util.Date");CGLIB$load_class$beanmapper_compare$2Evo$2ESourceVO$24Inner = Class.forName("beanmapper_compare.vo.SourceVO$Inner");CGLIB$load_class$java$2Eutil$2EList = Class.forName("java.util.List");CGLIB$load_class$java$2Eutil$2EMap = Class.forName("java.util.Map");CGLIB$load_class$java$2Elang$2EInteger = Class.forName("java.lang.Integer");CGLIB$load_class$java$2Elang$2ELong = Class.forName("java.lang.Long");CGLIB$load_class$java$2Elang$2EByte = Class.forName("java.lang.Byte");CGLIB$load_class$java$2Elang$2EString = Class.forName("java.lang.String");}static {CGLIB$STATICHOOK1();}}
小结
BeanCopier性能确实很高,但从源码可以看出BeanCopier只会拷贝名称和类型都相同的属性,而且如果一旦使用Converter,BeanCopier只使用Converter定义的规则去拷贝属性,所以在convert方法中要考虑所有的属性。
Dozer
使用
上面提到的BeanUtils和BeanCopier都是功能比较简单的,需要属性名称一样,甚至类型也要一样。但是在大多数情况下这个要求就相对苛刻了,要知道有些VO由于各种原因不能修改,有些是外部接口SDK的对象,
有些对象的命名规则不同,例如有驼峰型的,有下划线的等等,各种什么情况都有。所以我们更加需要的是更加灵活丰富的功能,甚至可以做到定制化的转换。
Dozer就提供了这些功能,有支持同名隐式映射,支持基本类型互相转换,支持显示指定映射关系,支持exclude字段,支持递归匹配映射,支持深度匹配,支持Date to String的date-formate,支持自定义转换Converter,支持一次mapping定义多处使用,支持EventListener事件监听等等。不仅如此,Dozer在使用方式上,除了支持API,还支持XML和注解,满足大家的喜好。更多的功能可以参考这里
由于其功能很丰富,不可能每个都演示,这里只是给个大概认识,更详细的功能,或者XML和注解的配置,请看官方文档。
private Mapper dozerMapper;@Beforepublic void setup(){dozerMapper = DozerBeanMapperBuilder.create().withMappingBuilder(new BeanMappingBuilder() {@Overrideprotected void configure() {mapping(SourceVO.class, TargetVO.class).fields("fullName", "name").exclude("in");}}).withCustomConverter(null).withEventListener(null).build();}@Testpublic void dozerTest(){SourceVO sourceVO = getSourceVO();log.info("sourceVO={}", GsonUtil.toJson(sourceVO));TargetVO map = dozerMapper.map(sourceVO, TargetVO.class);log.info("map={}", GsonUtil.toJson(map));}
原理
Dozer的实现原理本质上还是用反射/Introspector那套,但是其丰富的功能,以及支持多种实现方式(API、XML、注解)使得代码看上去有点复杂,在翻阅代码时,我们大可不必理会这些类,只需要知道它们大体的作用就行了,重点关注核心流程和代码的实现。下面我们重点看看构建mapper的build方法和实现映射的map方法。
build方法很简单,它是一个初始化的动作,就是通过用户的配置来构建出一系列后面要用到的配置对象、上下文对象,或其他封装对象,我们不必深究这些对象是怎么实现的,从名字上我们大概能猜出这些对象是干嘛,负责什么就可以了。
DozerBeanMapper(List<String> mappingFiles,BeanContainer beanContainer,DestBeanCreator destBeanCreator,DestBeanBuilderCreator destBeanBuilderCreator,BeanMappingGenerator beanMappingGenerator,PropertyDescriptorFactory propertyDescriptorFactory,List<CustomConverter> customConverters,List<MappingFileData> mappingsFileData,List<EventListener> eventListeners,CustomFieldMapper customFieldMapper,Map<String, CustomConverter> customConvertersWithId,ClassMappings customMappings,Configuration globalConfiguration,CacheManager cacheManager) {this.beanContainer = beanContainer;this.destBeanCreator = destBeanCreator;this.destBeanBuilderCreator = destBeanBuilderCreator;this.beanMappingGenerator = beanMappingGenerator;this.propertyDescriptorFactory = propertyDescriptorFactory;this.customConverters = new ArrayList<>(customConverters);this.eventListeners = new ArrayList<>(eventListeners);this.mappingFiles = new ArrayList<>(mappingFiles);this.customFieldMapper = customFieldMapper;this.customConvertersWithId = new HashMap<>(customConvertersWithId);this.eventManager = new DefaultEventManager(eventListeners);this.customMappings = customMappings;this.globalConfiguration = globalConfiguration;this.cacheManager = cacheManager;}
map方法是映射对象的过程,其入口是MappingProcessor的mapGeneral方法
private <T> T mapGeneral(Object srcObj, final Class<T> destClass, final T destObj, final String mapId) {srcObj = MappingUtils.deProxy(srcObj, beanContainer);Class<T> destType;T result;if (destClass == null) {destType = (Class<T>)destObj.getClass();result = destObj;} else {destType = destClass;result = null;}ClassMap classMap = null;try {//构建ClassMap//ClassMap是包括src类和dest类和其他配置的一个封装classMap = getClassMap(srcObj.getClass(), destType, mapId);//注册事件eventManager.on(new DefaultEvent(EventTypes.MAPPING_STARTED, classMap, null, srcObj, result, null));//看看有没有自定义converterClass<?> converterClass = MappingUtils.findCustomConverter(converterByDestTypeCache, classMap.getCustomConverters(), srcObj.getClass(), destType);if (destObj == null) {// If this is a nested MapperAware conversion this mapping can be already processed// but we can do this optimization only in case of no destObject, instead we must copy to the dest objectObject alreadyMappedValue = mappedFields.getMappedValue(srcObj, destType, mapId);if (alreadyMappedValue != null) {return (T)alreadyMappedValue;}}//优先使用自定义converter进行映射if (converterClass != null) {return (T)mapUsingCustomConverter(converterClass, srcObj.getClass(), srcObj, destType, result, null, true);}//也是对配置进行了封装BeanCreationDirective creationDirective =new BeanCreationDirective(srcObj, classMap.getSrcClassToMap(), classMap.getDestClassToMap(), destType,classMap.getDestClassBeanFactory(), classMap.getDestClassBeanFactoryId(), classMap.getDestClassCreateMethod(),classMap.getDestClass().isSkipConstructor());//继续进行映射result = createByCreationDirectiveAndMap(creationDirective, classMap, srcObj, result, false, null);} catch (Throwable e) {MappingUtils.throwMappingException(e);}eventManager.on(new DefaultEvent(EventTypes.MAPPING_FINISHED, classMap, null, srcObj, result, null));return result;}
一般情况下createByCreationDirectiveAndMap方法会一直调用到mapFromFieldMap方法,而在没有自定义converter的情况下会调用mapOrRecurseObject方法。
大多数情况下字段的映射会在这个方法做一般的解析
private Object mapOrRecurseObject(Object srcObj, Object srcFieldValue, Class<?> destFieldType, FieldMap fieldMap, Object destObj) {Class<?> srcFieldClass = srcFieldValue != null ? srcFieldValue.getClass() : fieldMap.getSrcFieldType(srcObj.getClass());Class<?> converterClass = MappingUtils.determineCustomConverter(fieldMap, converterByDestTypeCache, fieldMap.getClassMap().getCustomConverters(), srcFieldClass, destFieldType);//自定义converter的处理if (converterClass != null) {return mapUsingCustomConverter(converterClass, srcFieldClass, srcFieldValue, destFieldType, destObj, fieldMap, false);}if (srcFieldValue == null) {return null;}String srcFieldName = fieldMap.getSrcFieldName();String destFieldName = fieldMap.getDestFieldName();if (!(DozerConstants.SELF_KEYWORD.equals(srcFieldName) && DozerConstants.SELF_KEYWORD.equals(destFieldName))) {Object alreadyMappedValue = mappedFields.getMappedValue(srcFieldValue, destFieldType, fieldMap.getMapId());if (alreadyMappedValue != null) {return alreadyMappedValue;}}//如果只是浅拷贝则直接返回(可配置)if (fieldMap.isCopyByReference()) {// just get the src and return it, no transformation.return srcFieldValue;}//对Map类型的处理boolean isSrcFieldClassSupportedMap = MappingUtils.isSupportedMap(srcFieldClass);boolean isDestFieldTypeSupportedMap = MappingUtils.isSupportedMap(destFieldType);if (isSrcFieldClassSupportedMap && isDestFieldTypeSupportedMap) {return mapMap(srcObj, (Map<?, ?>)srcFieldValue, fieldMap, destObj);}if (fieldMap instanceof MapFieldMap && destFieldType.equals(Object.class)) {destFieldType = fieldMap.getDestHintContainer() != null ? fieldMap.getDestHintContainer().getHint() : srcFieldClass;}//对基本类型的映射处理//PrimitiveOrWrapperConverter类支持兼容了基本类型之间的互相转换if (primitiveConverter.accepts(srcFieldClass) || primitiveConverter.accepts(destFieldType)) {// Primitive or Wrapper conversionif (fieldMap.getDestHintContainer() != null) {Class<?> destHintType = fieldMap.getDestHintType(srcFieldValue.getClass());// if the destType is null this means that there was more than one hint.// we must have already set the destType then.if (destHintType != null) {destFieldType = destHintType;}}//#1841448 - if trim-strings=true, then use a trimmed src string value when converting to dest valueObject convertSrcFieldValue = srcFieldValue;if (fieldMap.isTrimStrings() && srcFieldValue.getClass().equals(String.class)) {convertSrcFieldValue = ((String)srcFieldValue).trim();}DateFormatContainer dfContainer = new DateFormatContainer(fieldMap.getDateFormat());if (fieldMap instanceof MapFieldMap && !primitiveConverter.accepts(destFieldType)) {return primitiveConverter.convert(convertSrcFieldValue, convertSrcFieldValue.getClass(), dfContainer);} else {return primitiveConverter.convert(convertSrcFieldValue, destFieldType, dfContainer, destFieldName, destObj);}}//对集合类型的映射处理if (MappingUtils.isSupportedCollection(srcFieldClass) && (MappingUtils.isSupportedCollection(destFieldType))) {return mapCollection(srcObj, srcFieldValue, fieldMap, destObj);}//对枚举类型的映射处理if (MappingUtils.isEnumType(srcFieldClass, destFieldType)) {return mapEnum((Enum)srcFieldValue, (Class<Enum>)destFieldType);}if (fieldMap.getDestDeepIndexHintContainer() != null) {destFieldType = fieldMap.getDestDeepIndexHintContainer().getHint();}//其他复杂对象类型的处理return mapCustomObject(fieldMap, destObj, destFieldType, destFieldName, srcFieldValue);}mapCustomObject方法。其实你会发现这个方法最重要的一点就是做递归处理,无论是最后调用createByCreationDirectiveAndMap还是mapToDestObject方法。private Object mapCustomObject(FieldMap fieldMap, Object destObj, Class<?> destFieldType, String destFieldName, Object srcFieldValue) {srcFieldValue = MappingUtils.deProxy(srcFieldValue, beanContainer);// Custom java bean. Need to make sure that the destination object is not// already instantiated.Object result = null;// in case of iterate feature new objects are created in any caseif (!DozerConstants.ITERATE.equals(fieldMap.getDestFieldType())) {result = getExistingValue(fieldMap, destObj, destFieldType);}// if the field is not null than we don't want a new instanceif (result == null) {// first check to see if this plain old field map has hints to the actual// type.if (fieldMap.getDestHintContainer() != null) {Class<?> destHintType = fieldMap.getDestHintType(srcFieldValue.getClass());// if the destType is null this means that there was more than one hint.// we must have already set the destType then.if (destHintType != null) {destFieldType = destHintType;}}// Check to see if explicit map-id has been specified for the field// mappingString mapId = fieldMap.getMapId();Class<?> targetClass;if (fieldMap.getDestHintContainer() != null && fieldMap.getDestHintContainer().getHint() != null) {targetClass = fieldMap.getDestHintContainer().getHint();} else {targetClass = destFieldType;}ClassMap classMap = getClassMap(srcFieldValue.getClass(), targetClass, mapId);BeanCreationDirective creationDirective = new BeanCreationDirective(srcFieldValue, classMap.getSrcClassToMap(), classMap.getDestClassToMap(),destFieldType, classMap.getDestClassBeanFactory(), classMap.getDestClassBeanFactoryId(),fieldMap.getDestFieldCreateMethod() != null ? fieldMap.getDestFieldCreateMethod() :classMap.getDestClassCreateMethod(),classMap.getDestClass().isSkipConstructor(), destObj, destFieldName);result = createByCreationDirectiveAndMap(creationDirective, classMap, srcFieldValue, null, false, fieldMap.getMapId());} else {mapToDestObject(null, srcFieldValue, result, false, fieldMap.getMapId());}return result;}
小结
Dozer功能强大,但底层还是用反射那套,所以在性能测试中它的表现一般,仅次于Apache的BeanUtils。如果不追求性能的话,可以使用。
Orika
Orika可以说是几乎集成了上述几个工具的优点,不仅具有丰富的功能,底层使用Javassist生成字节码,运行 效率很高的。
使用
Orika基本支持了Dozer支持的功能,这里我也是简单介绍一下Orika的使用,具体更详细的API可以参考User Guide。
private MapperFactory mapperFactory;@Beforepublic void setup() {mapperFactory = new DefaultMapperFactory.Builder().build();ConverterFactory converterFactory = mapperFactory.getConverterFactory();converterFactory.registerConverter(new TypeConverter());mapperFactory.classMap(SourceVO.class, TargetVO.class).field("fullName", "name").field("type", "enumType").exclude("in").byDefault().register();}@Testpublic void main() {MapperFacade mapper = mapperFactory.getMapperFacade();SourceVO sourceVO = getSourceVO();log.info("sourceVO={}", GsonUtil.toJson(sourceVO));TargetVO map = mapper.map(sourceVO, TargetVO.class);log.info("map={}", GsonUtil.toJson(map));}
原理
在讲解实现原理时,我们先看看Orika在背后干了什么事情。
通过增加以下配置,我们可以看到Orika在做映射过程中生成mapper的源码和字节码。
System.setProperty("ma.glasnost.orika.writeSourceFiles", "true");System.setProperty("ma.glasnost.orika.writeClassFiles", "true");System.setProperty("ma.glasnost.orika.writeSourceFilesToPath", "path");System.setProperty("ma.glasnost.orika.writeClassFilesToPath", "path");
用上面的例子,我们看看Orika生成的java代码:
package ma.glasnost.orika.generated;public class Orika_TargetVO_SourceVO_Mapper947163525829122$0 extends ma.glasnost.orika.impl.GeneratedMapperBase {public void mapAtoB(java.lang.Object a, java.lang.Object b, ma.glasnost.orika.MappingContext mappingContext) {super.mapAtoB(a, b, mappingContext);// sourceType: SourceVObeanmapper_compare.vo.SourceVO source = ((beanmapper_compare.vo.SourceVO)a);// destinationType: TargetVObeanmapper_compare.vo.TargetVO destination = ((beanmapper_compare.vo.TargetVO)b);destination.setName(((java.lang.String)source.getFullName()));if ( !(((java.lang.Integer)source.getType()) == null)){destination.setEnumType(((beanmapper_compare.vo.TargetVO.EnumType)((ma.glasnost.orika.Converter)usedConverters[0]).convert(((java.lang.Integer)source.getType()), ((ma.glasnost.orika.metadata.Type)usedTypes[0]), mappingContext)));} else {destination.setEnumType(null);}if ( !(((java.util.Date)source.getDate1()) == null)){destination.setDate1(((java.util.Date)((ma.glasnost.orika.Converter)usedConverters[1]).convert(((java.util.Date)source.getDate1()), ((ma.glasnost.orika.metadata.Type)usedTypes[1]), mappingContext)));} else {destination.setDate1(null);}if ( !(((java.util.List)source.getListData()) == null)) {java.util.List new_listData = ((java.util.List)new java.util.ArrayList());new_listData.addAll(mapperFacade.mapAsList(((java.util.List)source.getListData()), ((ma.glasnost.orika.metadata.Type)usedTypes[2]), ((ma.glasnost.orika.metadata.Type)usedTypes[3]), mappingContext));destination.setListData(new_listData);} else {if ( !(((java.util.List)destination.getListData()) == null)) {destination.setListData(null);};}if ( !(((java.util.Map)source.getMapData()) == null)){java.util.Map new_mapData = ((java.util.Map)new java.util.LinkedHashMap());for( java.util.Iterator mapData_$_iter = ((java.util.Map)source.getMapData()).entrySet().iterator(); mapData_$_iter.hasNext(); ) {java.util.Map.Entry sourceMapDataEntry = ((java.util.Map.Entry)mapData_$_iter.next());java.lang.Integer newMapDataKey = null;java.util.List newMapDataVal = null;if ( !(((java.lang.Long)sourceMapDataEntry.getKey()) == null)){newMapDataKey = ((java.lang.Integer)((ma.glasnost.orika.Converter)usedConverters[2]).convert(((java.lang.Long)sourceMapDataEntry.getKey()), ((ma.glasnost.orika.metadata.Type)usedTypes[3]), mappingContext));} else {newMapDataKey = null;}if ( !(((java.util.List)sourceMapDataEntry.getValue()) == null)) {java.util.List new_newMapDataVal = ((java.util.List)new java.util.ArrayList());new_newMapDataVal.addAll(mapperFacade.mapAsList(((java.util.List)sourceMapDataEntry.getValue()), ((ma.glasnost.orika.metadata.Type)usedTypes[2]), ((ma.glasnost.orika.metadata.Type)usedTypes[4]), mappingContext));newMapDataVal = new_newMapDataVal;} else {if ( !(newMapDataVal == null)) {newMapDataVal = null;};}new_mapData.put(newMapDataKey, newMapDataVal);}destination.setMapData(new_mapData);} else {destination.setMapData(null);}destination.setP1(((java.lang.Integer)source.getP1()));destination.setP2(((java.lang.Long)source.getP2()));destination.setP3(((java.lang.Byte)source.getP3()));destination.setPattr1(((java.lang.String)source.getPattr1()));if ( !(((java.lang.String)source.getSeq()) == null)){destination.setSeq(((java.lang.Long)((ma.glasnost.orika.Converter)usedConverters[3]).convert(((java.lang.String)source.getSeq()), ((ma.glasnost.orika.metadata.Type)usedTypes[2]), mappingContext)));} else {destination.setSeq(null);}if(customMapper != null) {customMapper.mapAtoB(source, destination, mappingContext);}}public void mapBtoA(java.lang.Object a, java.lang.Object b, ma.glasnost.orika.MappingContext mappingContext) {super.mapBtoA(a, b, mappingContext);// sourceType: TargetVObeanmapper_compare.vo.TargetVO source = ((beanmapper_compare.vo.TargetVO)a);// destinationType: SourceVObeanmapper_compare.vo.SourceVO destination = ((beanmapper_compare.vo.SourceVO)b);destination.setFullName(((java.lang.String)source.getName()));if ( !(((beanmapper_compare.vo.TargetVO.EnumType)source.getEnumType()) == null)){destination.setType(((java.lang.Integer)((ma.glasnost.orika.Converter)usedConverters[0]).convert(((beanmapper_compare.vo.TargetVO.EnumType)source.getEnumType()), ((ma.glasnost.orika.metadata.Type)usedTypes[3]), mappingContext)));} else {destination.setType(null);}if ( !(((java.util.Date)source.getDate1()) == null)){destination.setDate1(((java.util.Date)((ma.glasnost.orika.Converter)usedConverters[1]).convert(((java.util.Date)source.getDate1()), ((ma.glasnost.orika.metadata.Type)usedTypes[1]), mappingContext)));} else {destination.setDate1(null);}if ( !(((java.util.List)source.getListData()) == null)) {java.util.List new_listData = ((java.util.List)new java.util.ArrayList());new_listData.addAll(mapperFacade.mapAsList(((java.util.List)source.getListData()), ((ma.glasnost.orika.metadata.Type)usedTypes[3]), ((ma.glasnost.orika.metadata.Type)usedTypes[2]), mappingContext));destination.setListData(new_listData);} else {if ( !(((java.util.List)destination.getListData()) == null)) {destination.setListData(null);};}if ( !(((java.util.Map)source.getMapData()) == null)){java.util.Map new_mapData = ((java.util.Map)new java.util.LinkedHashMap());for( java.util.Iterator mapData_$_iter = ((java.util.Map)source.getMapData()).entrySet().iterator(); mapData_$_iter.hasNext(); ) {java.util.Map.Entry sourceMapDataEntry = ((java.util.Map.Entry)mapData_$_iter.next());java.lang.Long newMapDataKey = null;java.util.List newMapDataVal = null;if ( !(((java.lang.Integer)sourceMapDataEntry.getKey()) == null)){newMapDataKey = ((java.lang.Long)((ma.glasnost.orika.Converter)usedConverters[2]).convert(((java.lang.Integer)sourceMapDataEntry.getKey()), ((ma.glasnost.orika.metadata.Type)usedTypes[2]), mappingContext));} else {newMapDataKey = null;}if ( !(((java.util.List)sourceMapDataEntry.getValue()) == null)) {java.util.List new_newMapDataVal = ((java.util.List)new java.util.ArrayList());new_newMapDataVal.addAll(mapperFacade.mapAsList(((java.util.List)sourceMapDataEntry.getValue()), ((ma.glasnost.orika.metadata.Type)usedTypes[4]), ((ma.glasnost.orika.metadata.Type)usedTypes[2]), mappingContext));newMapDataVal = new_newMapDataVal;} else {if ( !(newMapDataVal == null)) {newMapDataVal = null;};}new_mapData.put(newMapDataKey, newMapDataVal);}destination.setMapData(new_mapData);} else {destination.setMapData(null);}destination.setP1(((java.lang.Integer)source.getP1()));destination.setP2(((java.lang.Long)source.getP2()));destination.setP3(((java.lang.Byte)source.getP3()));destination.setPattr1(((java.lang.String)source.getPattr1()));if ( !(((java.lang.Long)source.getSeq()) == null)){destination.setSeq(((java.lang.String)((ma.glasnost.orika.Converter)usedConverters[4]).convert(((java.lang.Long)source.getSeq()), ((ma.glasnost.orika.metadata.Type)usedTypes[5]), mappingContext)));} else {destination.setSeq(null);}if(customMapper != null) {customMapper.mapBtoA(source, destination, mappingContext);}}}
这个mapper类就两个方法mapAtoB和mapBtoA,从名字看猜到前者是负责src -> dest的映射,后者是负责dest -> src的映射。
好,我们们看看实现的过程。
Orika的使用跟Dozer的类似,首先通过配置生成一个MapperFactory,再用MapperFacade来作为映射的统一入口,这里MapperFactory和MapperFacade都是单例的。mapperFactory在做配置类映射时,只是注册了ClassMap,还没有真正的生成mapper的字节码,是在第一次调用getMapperFacade方法时才初始化mapper。下面看看getMapperFacade。
(源码基于 ma.glasnost.orika:orika-core:1.5.4)
public MapperFacade getMapperFacade() {if (!isBuilt) {synchronized (mapperFacade) {if (!isBuilt) {build();}}}return mapperFacade;}利用注册的ClassMap信息和MappingContext上下文信息来构造mapperpublic synchronized void build() {if (!isBuilding && !isBuilt) {isBuilding = true;MappingContext context = contextFactory.getContext();try {if (useBuiltinConverters) {BuiltinConverters.register(converterFactory);}converterFactory.setMapperFacade(mapperFacade);for (Map.Entry<MapperKey, ClassMap<Object, Object>> classMapEntry : classMapRegistry.entrySet()) {ClassMap<Object, Object> classMap = classMapEntry.getValue();if (classMap.getUsedMappers().isEmpty()) {classMapEntry.setValue(classMap.copyWithUsedMappers(discoverUsedMappers(classMap)));}}buildClassMapRegistry();Map<ClassMap<?, ?>, GeneratedMapperBase> generatedMappers = new HashMap<ClassMap<?, ?>, GeneratedMapperBase>();//重点看这里//在使用mapperFactory配置classMap时,会存放在classMapRegistry里for (ClassMap<?, ?> classMap : classMapRegistry.values()) {//对每个classMap生成一个mapper,重点看buildMapper方法generatedMappers.put(classMap, buildMapper(classMap, false, context));}Set<Entry<ClassMap<?, ?>, GeneratedMapperBase>> generatedMapperEntries = generatedMappers.entrySet();for (Entry<ClassMap<?, ?>, GeneratedMapperBase> generatedMapperEntry : generatedMapperEntries) {buildObjectFactories(generatedMapperEntry.getKey(), context);initializeUsedMappers(generatedMapperEntry.getValue(), generatedMapperEntry.getKey(), context);}} finally {contextFactory.release(context);}isBuilt = true;isBuilding = false;}}public Set<ClassMap<Object, Object>> lookupUsedClassMap(MapperKey mapperKey) {Set<ClassMap<Object, Object>> usedClassMapSet = usedMapperMetadataRegistry.get(mapperKey);if (usedClassMapSet == null) {usedClassMapSet = Collections.emptySet();}return usedClassMapSet;}跟踪buildMapper方法private GeneratedMapperBase buildMapper(ClassMap<?, ?> classMap, boolean isAutoGenerated, MappingContext context) {register(classMap.getAType(), classMap.getBType(), isAutoGenerated);register(classMap.getBType(), classMap.getAType(), isAutoGenerated);final MapperKey mapperKey = new MapperKey(classMap.getAType(), classMap.getBType());//调用mapperGenerator的build方法生成mapperfinal GeneratedMapperBase mapper = mapperGenerator.build(classMap, context);mapper.setMapperFacade(mapperFacade);mapper.setFromAutoMapping(isAutoGenerated);if (classMap.getCustomizedMapper() != null) {final Mapper<Object, Object> customizedMapper = (Mapper<Object, Object>) classMap.getCustomizedMapper();mapper.setCustomMapper(customizedMapper);}mappersRegistry.remove(mapper);//生成的mapper存放到mappersRegistrymappersRegistry.add(mapper);classMapRegistry.put(mapperKey, (ClassMap<Object, Object>) classMap);return mapper;}MapperGenerator的build方法public GeneratedMapperBase build(ClassMap<?, ?> classMap, MappingContext context) {StringBuilder logDetails = null;try {compilerStrategy.assureTypeIsAccessible(classMap.getAType().getRawType());compilerStrategy.assureTypeIsAccessible(classMap.getBType().getRawType());if (LOGGER.isDebugEnabled()) {logDetails = new StringBuilder();String srcName = TypeFactory.nameOf(classMap.getAType(), classMap.getBType());String dstName = TypeFactory.nameOf(classMap.getBType(), classMap.getAType());logDetails.append("Generating new mapper for (" + srcName + ", " + dstName + ")");}//构建用来生成源码及字节码的上下文final SourceCodeContext mapperCode = new SourceCodeContext(classMap.getMapperClassName(), GeneratedMapperBase.class, context,logDetails);Set<FieldMap> mappedFields = new LinkedHashSet<FieldMap>();//增加mapAtoB方法mappedFields.addAll(addMapMethod(mapperCode, true, classMap, logDetails));//增加mapBtoA方法//addMapMethod方法基本就是手写代码的过程,有兴趣的读者可以看看mappedFields.addAll(addMapMethod(mapperCode, false, classMap, logDetails));//生成一个mapper实例GeneratedMapperBase instance = mapperCode.getInstance();instance.setAType(classMap.getAType());instance.setBType(classMap.getBType());instance.setFavorsExtension(classMap.favorsExtension());if (logDetails != null) {LOGGER.debug(logDetails.toString());logDetails = null;}classMap = classMap.copy(mappedFields);context.registerMapperGeneration(classMap);return instance;} catch (final Exception e) {if (logDetails != null) {logDetails.append("\n<---- ERROR occurred here");LOGGER.debug(logDetails.toString());}throw new MappingException(e);}生成mapper实例T instance = (T) compileClass().newInstance();protected Class<?> compileClass() throws SourceCodeGenerationException {try {return compilerStrategy.compileClass(this);} catch (SourceCodeGenerationException e) {throw e;}}这里的compilerStrategy的默认是用Javassist(你也可以自定义生成字节码的策略)JavassistCompilerStrategy的compileClass方法这基本上就是一个使用Javassist的过程,经过前面的各种铺垫(通过配置信息、上下文信息、拼装java源代码等等),终于来到这一步public Class<?> compileClass(SourceCodeContext sourceCode) throws SourceCodeGenerationException {StringBuilder className = new StringBuilder(sourceCode.getClassName());CtClass byteCodeClass = null;int attempts = 0;Random rand = RANDOM;while (byteCodeClass == null) {try {//创建一个类byteCodeClass = classPool.makeClass(className.toString());} catch (RuntimeException e) {if (attempts < 5) {className.append(Integer.toHexString(rand.nextInt()));} else {// No longer likely to be accidental name collision;// propagate the errorthrow e;}}}CtClass abstractMapperClass;Class<?> compiledClass;try {//把源码写到磁盘(通过上面提到的配置)writeSourceFile(sourceCode);Boolean existing = superClasses.put(sourceCode.getSuperClass(), true);if (existing == null || !existing) {classPool.insertClassPath(new ClassClassPath(sourceCode.getSuperClass()));}if (registerClassLoader(Thread.currentThread().getContextClassLoader())) {classPool.insertClassPath(new LoaderClassPath(Thread.currentThread().getContextClassLoader()));}abstractMapperClass = classPool.get(sourceCode.getSuperClass().getCanonicalName());byteCodeClass.setSuperclass(abstractMapperClass);//增加字段for (String fieldDef : sourceCode.getFields()) {try {byteCodeClass.addField(CtField.make(fieldDef, byteCodeClass));} catch (CannotCompileException e) {LOG.error("An exception occurred while compiling: " + fieldDef + " for " + sourceCode.getClassName(), e);throw e;}}//增加方法,这里主要就是mapAtoB和mapBtoA方法//直接用源码通过Javassist往类“加”方法for (String methodDef : sourceCode.getMethods()) {try {byteCodeClass.addMethod(CtNewMethod.make(methodDef, byteCodeClass));} catch (CannotCompileException e) {LOG.error("An exception occured while compiling the following method:\n\n " + methodDef + "\n\n for "+ sourceCode.getClassName() + "\n", e);throw e;}}//生成类compiledClass = byteCodeClass.toClass(Thread.currentThread().getContextClassLoader(), this.getClass().getProtectionDomain());//字节码文件写磁盘writeClassFile(sourceCode, byteCodeClass);} catch (NotFoundException e) {throw new SourceCodeGenerationException(e);} catch (CannotCompileException e) {throw new SourceCodeGenerationException("Error compiling " + sourceCode.getClassName(), e);} catch (IOException e) {throw new SourceCodeGenerationException("Could not write files for " + sourceCode.getClassName(), e);}return compiledClass;}
好,mapper类生成了,现在就看在调用MapperFacade的map方法是如何使用这个mapper类的。
其实很简单,还记得生成的mapper是放到mappersRegistry吗,跟踪代码,在resolveMappingStrategy方法根据typeA和typeB在mappersRegistry找到mapper,在调用mapper的mapAtoB或mapBtoA方法即可。
小结
总体来说,Orika是一个功能强大的而且性能很高的工具,推荐使用。
总结
通过对BeanUtils、BeanCopier、Dozer、Orika这几个工具的对比,我们得知了它们的性能以及实现原理。在使用时,我们可以根据自己的实际情况选择,推荐使用Orika。另外,关注公众号Java技术栈,在后台回复:面试,可以获取我整理的 Java 系列面试题和答案,非常齐全。
