Categorical data
This is an introduction to pandas categorical data type, including a short comparison
with R’s factor.
Categoricals are a pandas data type corresponding to categorical variables in statistics. A categorical variable takes on a limited, and usually fixed, number of possible values (categories; levels in R). Examples are gender, social class, blood type, country affiliation, observation time or rating via Likert scales.
In contrast to statistical categorical variables, categorical data might have an order (e.g. ‘strongly agree’ vs ‘agree’ or ‘first observation’ vs. ‘second observation’), but numerical operations (additions, divisions, …) are not possible.
All values of categorical data are either in categories or np.nan. Order is defined by the order of categories, not lexical order of the values. Internally, the data structure consists of a categories array and an integer array of codes which point to the real value in the categories array.
The categorical data type is useful in the following cases:
- A string variable consisting of only a few different values. Converting such a string variable to a categorical variable will save some memory, see here.
- The lexical order of a variable is not the same as the logical order (“one”, “two”, “three”). By converting to a categorical and specifying an order on the categories, sorting and min/max will use the logical order instead of the lexical order, see here.
- As a signal to other Python libraries that this column should be treated as a categorical variable (e.g. to use suitable statistical methods or plot types).
See also the API docs on categoricals.
Object creation
Series creation
Categorical Series or columns in a DataFrame can be created in several ways:
By specifying dtype="category" when constructing a Series:
In [1]: s = pd.Series(["a", "b", "c", "a"], dtype="category")In [2]: sOut[2]:0 a1 b2 c3 adtype: categoryCategories (3, object): [a, b, c]
By converting an existing Series or column to a category dtype:
In [3]: df = pd.DataFrame({"A": ["a", "b", "c", "a"]})In [4]: df["B"] = df["A"].astype('category')In [5]: dfOut[5]:A B0 a a1 b b2 c c3 a a
By using special functions, such as cut(), which groups data into
discrete bins. See the example on tiling in the docs.
In [6]: df = pd.DataFrame({'value': np.random.randint(0, 100, 20)})In [7]: labels = ["{0} - {1}".format(i, i + 9) for i in range(0, 100, 10)]In [8]: df['group'] = pd.cut(df.value, range(0, 105, 10), right=False, labels=labels)In [9]: df.head(10)Out[9]:value group0 65 60 - 691 49 40 - 492 56 50 - 593 43 40 - 494 43 40 - 495 91 90 - 996 32 30 - 397 87 80 - 898 36 30 - 399 8 0 - 9
By passing a pandas.Categorical object to a Series or assigning it to a DataFrame.
In [10]: raw_cat = pd.Categorical(["a", "b", "c", "a"], categories=["b", "c", "d"],....: ordered=False)....:In [11]: s = pd.Series(raw_cat)In [12]: sOut[12]:0 NaN1 b2 c3 NaNdtype: categoryCategories (3, object): [b, c, d]In [13]: df = pd.DataFrame({"A": ["a", "b", "c", "a"]})In [14]: df["B"] = raw_catIn [15]: dfOut[15]:A B0 a NaN1 b b2 c c3 a NaN
Categorical data has a specific category dtype:
In [16]: df.dtypesOut[16]:A objectB categorydtype: object
DataFrame creation
Similar to the previous section where a single column was converted to categorical, all columns in a
DataFrame can be batch converted to categorical either during or after construction.
This can be done during construction by specifying dtype="category" in the DataFrame constructor:
In [17]: df = pd.DataFrame({'A': list('abca'), 'B': list('bccd')}, dtype="category")In [18]: df.dtypesOut[18]:A categoryB categorydtype: object
Note that the categories present in each column differ; the conversion is done column by column, so only labels present in a given column are categories:
In [19]: df['A']Out[19]:0 a1 b2 c3 aName: A, dtype: categoryCategories (3, object): [a, b, c]In [20]: df['B']Out[20]:0 b1 c2 c3 dName: B, dtype: categoryCategories (3, object): [b, c, d]
New in version 0.23.0.
Analogously, all columns in an existing DataFrame can be batch converted using DataFrame.astype():
In [21]: df = pd.DataFrame({'A': list('abca'), 'B': list('bccd')})In [22]: df_cat = df.astype('category')In [23]: df_cat.dtypesOut[23]:A categoryB categorydtype: object
This conversion is likewise done column by column:
In [24]: df_cat['A']Out[24]:0 a1 b2 c3 aName: A, dtype: categoryCategories (3, object): [a, b, c]In [25]: df_cat['B']Out[25]:0 b1 c2 c3 dName: B, dtype: categoryCategories (3, object): [b, c, d]
Controlling behavior
In the examples above where we passed dtype='category', we used the default
behavior:
- Categories are inferred from the data.
- Categories are unordered.
To control those behaviors, instead of passing 'category', use an instance
of CategoricalDtype.
In [26]: from pandas.api.types import CategoricalDtypeIn [27]: s = pd.Series(["a", "b", "c", "a"])In [28]: cat_type = CategoricalDtype(categories=["b", "c", "d"],....: ordered=True)....:In [29]: s_cat = s.astype(cat_type)In [30]: s_catOut[30]:0 NaN1 b2 c3 NaNdtype: categoryCategories (3, object): [b < c < d]
Similarly, a CategoricalDtype can be used with a DataFrame to ensure that categories
are consistent among all columns.
In [31]: from pandas.api.types import CategoricalDtypeIn [32]: df = pd.DataFrame({'A': list('abca'), 'B': list('bccd')})In [33]: cat_type = CategoricalDtype(categories=list('abcd'),....: ordered=True)....:In [34]: df_cat = df.astype(cat_type)In [35]: df_cat['A']Out[35]:0 a1 b2 c3 aName: A, dtype: categoryCategories (4, object): [a < b < c < d]In [36]: df_cat['B']Out[36]:0 b1 c2 c3 dName: B, dtype: categoryCategories (4, object): [a < b < c < d]
::: tip Note
To perform table-wise conversion, where all labels in the entire DataFrame are used as
categories for each column, the categories parameter can be determined programmatically by
categories = pd.unique(df.to_numpy().ravel()).
:::
If you already have codes and categories, you can use the
from_codes() constructor to save the factorize step
during normal constructor mode:
In [37]: splitter = np.random.choice([0, 1], 5, p=[0.5, 0.5])In [38]: s = pd.Series(pd.Categorical.from_codes(splitter,....: categories=["train", "test"]))....:
Regaining original data
To get back to the original Series or NumPy array, use
Series.astype(original_dtype) or np.asarray(categorical):
In [39]: s = pd.Series(["a", "b", "c", "a"])In [40]: sOut[40]:0 a1 b2 c3 adtype: objectIn [41]: s2 = s.astype('category')In [42]: s2Out[42]:0 a1 b2 c3 adtype: categoryCategories (3, object): [a, b, c]In [43]: s2.astype(str)Out[43]:0 a1 b2 c3 adtype: objectIn [44]: np.asarray(s2)Out[44]: array(['a', 'b', 'c', 'a'], dtype=object)
::: tip Note
In contrast to R’s factor function, categorical data is not converting input values to strings; categories will end up the same data type as the original values.
:::
::: tip Note
In contrast to R’s factor function, there is currently no way to assign/change labels at creation time. Use categories to change the categories after creation time.
:::
CategoricalDtype
Changed in version 0.21.0.
A categorical’s type is fully described by
categories: a sequence of unique values and no missing valuesordered: a boolean
This information can be stored in a CategoricalDtype.
The categories argument is optional, which implies that the actual categories
should be inferred from whatever is present in the data when the
pandas.Categorical is created. The categories are assumed to be unordered
by default.
In [45]: from pandas.api.types import CategoricalDtypeIn [46]: CategoricalDtype(['a', 'b', 'c'])Out[46]: CategoricalDtype(categories=['a', 'b', 'c'], ordered=None)In [47]: CategoricalDtype(['a', 'b', 'c'], ordered=True)Out[47]: CategoricalDtype(categories=['a', 'b', 'c'], ordered=True)In [48]: CategoricalDtype()Out[48]: CategoricalDtype(categories=None, ordered=None)
A CategoricalDtype can be used in any place pandas
expects a dtype. For example pandas.read_csv(),
pandas.DataFrame.astype(), or in the Series constructor.
::: tip Note
As a convenience, you can use the string 'category' in place of a
CategoricalDtype when you want the default behavior of
the categories being unordered, and equal to the set values present in the
array. In other words, dtype='category' is equivalent to
dtype=CategoricalDtype().
:::
Equality semantics
Two instances of CategoricalDtype compare equal
whenever they have the same categories and order. When comparing two
unordered categoricals, the order of the categories is not considered.
In [49]: c1 = CategoricalDtype(['a', 'b', 'c'], ordered=False)# Equal, since order is not considered when ordered=FalseIn [50]: c1 == CategoricalDtype(['b', 'c', 'a'], ordered=False)Out[50]: True# Unequal, since the second CategoricalDtype is orderedIn [51]: c1 == CategoricalDtype(['a', 'b', 'c'], ordered=True)Out[51]: False
All instances of CategoricalDtype compare equal to the string 'category'.
In [52]: c1 == 'category'Out[52]: True
::: danger Warning
Since dtype='category' is essentially CategoricalDtype(None, False),
and since all instances CategoricalDtype compare equal to 'category',
all instances of CategoricalDtype compare equal to a
CategoricalDtype(None, False), regardless of categories or
ordered.
:::
Description
Using describe() on categorical data will produce similar
output to a Series or DataFrame of type string.
In [53]: cat = pd.Categorical(["a", "c", "c", np.nan], categories=["b", "a", "c"])In [54]: df = pd.DataFrame({"cat": cat, "s": ["a", "c", "c", np.nan]})In [55]: df.describe()Out[55]:cat scount 3 3unique 2 2top c cfreq 2 2In [56]: df["cat"].describe()Out[56]:count 3unique 2top cfreq 2Name: cat, dtype: object
Working with categories
Categorical data has a categories and a ordered property, which list their
possible values and whether the ordering matters or not. These properties are
exposed as s.cat.categories and s.cat.ordered. If you don’t manually
specify categories and ordering, they are inferred from the passed arguments.
In [57]: s = pd.Series(["a", "b", "c", "a"], dtype="category")In [58]: s.cat.categoriesOut[58]: Index(['a', 'b', 'c'], dtype='object')In [59]: s.cat.orderedOut[59]: False
It’s also possible to pass in the categories in a specific order:
In [60]: s = pd.Series(pd.Categorical(["a", "b", "c", "a"],....: categories=["c", "b", "a"]))....:In [61]: s.cat.categoriesOut[61]: Index(['c', 'b', 'a'], dtype='object')In [62]: s.cat.orderedOut[62]: False
::: tip Note
New categorical data are not automatically ordered. You must explicitly
pass ordered=True to indicate an ordered Categorical.
:::
::: tip Note
The result of unique() is not always the same as Series.cat.categories,
because Series.unique() has a couple of guarantees, namely that it returns categories
in the order of appearance, and it only includes values that are actually present.
In [63]: s = pd.Series(list('babc')).astype(CategoricalDtype(list('abcd')))In [64]: sOut[64]:0 b1 a2 b3 cdtype: categoryCategories (4, object): [a, b, c, d]# categoriesIn [65]: s.cat.categoriesOut[65]: Index(['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'], dtype='object')# uniquesIn [66]: s.unique()Out[66]:[b, a, c]Categories (3, object): [b, a, c]
:::
Renaming categories
Renaming categories is done by assigning new values to the
Series.cat.categories property or by using the
rename_categories() method:
In [67]: s = pd.Series(["a", "b", "c", "a"], dtype="category")In [68]: sOut[68]:0 a1 b2 c3 adtype: categoryCategories (3, object): [a, b, c]In [69]: s.cat.categories = ["Group %s" % g for g in s.cat.categories]In [70]: sOut[70]:0 Group a1 Group b2 Group c3 Group adtype: categoryCategories (3, object): [Group a, Group b, Group c]In [71]: s = s.cat.rename_categories([1, 2, 3])In [72]: sOut[72]:0 11 22 33 1dtype: categoryCategories (3, int64): [1, 2, 3]# You can also pass a dict-like object to map the renamingIn [73]: s = s.cat.rename_categories({1: 'x', 2: 'y', 3: 'z'})In [74]: sOut[74]:0 x1 y2 z3 xdtype: categoryCategories (3, object): [x, y, z]
::: tip Note
In contrast to R’s factor, categorical data can have categories of other types than string.
:::
::: tip Note
Be aware that assigning new categories is an inplace operation, while most other operations
under Series.cat per default return a new Series of dtype category.
:::
Categories must be unique or a ValueError is raised:
In [75]: try:....: s.cat.categories = [1, 1, 1]....: except ValueError as e:....: print("ValueError:", str(e))....:ValueError: Categorical categories must be unique
Categories must also not be NaN or a ValueError is raised:
In [76]: try:....: s.cat.categories = [1, 2, np.nan]....: except ValueError as e:....: print("ValueError:", str(e))....:ValueError: Categorial categories cannot be null
Appending new categories
Appending categories can be done by using the
add_categories() method:
In [77]: s = s.cat.add_categories([4])In [78]: s.cat.categoriesOut[78]: Index(['x', 'y', 'z', 4], dtype='object')In [79]: sOut[79]:0 x1 y2 z3 xdtype: categoryCategories (4, object): [x, y, z, 4]
Removing categories
Removing categories can be done by using the
remove_categories() method. Values which are removed
are replaced by np.nan.:
In [80]: s = s.cat.remove_categories([4])In [81]: sOut[81]:0 x1 y2 z3 xdtype: categoryCategories (3, object): [x, y, z]
Removing unused categories
Removing unused categories can also be done:
In [82]: s = pd.Series(pd.Categorical(["a", "b", "a"],....: categories=["a", "b", "c", "d"]))....:In [83]: sOut[83]:0 a1 b2 adtype: categoryCategories (4, object): [a, b, c, d]In [84]: s.cat.remove_unused_categories()Out[84]:0 a1 b2 adtype: categoryCategories (2, object): [a, b]
Setting categories
If you want to do remove and add new categories in one step (which has some
speed advantage), or simply set the categories to a predefined scale,
use set_categories().
In [85]: s = pd.Series(["one", "two", "four", "-"], dtype="category")In [86]: sOut[86]:0 one1 two2 four3 -dtype: categoryCategories (4, object): [-, four, one, two]In [87]: s = s.cat.set_categories(["one", "two", "three", "four"])In [88]: sOut[88]:0 one1 two2 four3 NaNdtype: categoryCategories (4, object): [one, two, three, four]
::: tip Note
Be aware that Categorical.set_categories() cannot know whether some category is omitted
intentionally or because it is misspelled or (under Python3) due to a type difference (e.g.,
NumPy S1 dtype and Python strings). This can result in surprising behaviour!
:::
Sorting and order
If categorical data is ordered (s.cat.ordered == True), then the order of the categories has a
meaning and certain operations are possible. If the categorical is unordered, .min()/.max() will raise a TypeError.
In [89]: s = pd.Series(pd.Categorical(["a", "b", "c", "a"], ordered=False))In [90]: s.sort_values(inplace=True)In [91]: s = pd.Series(["a", "b", "c", "a"]).astype(....: CategoricalDtype(ordered=True)....: )....:In [92]: s.sort_values(inplace=True)In [93]: sOut[93]:0 a3 a1 b2 cdtype: categoryCategories (3, object): [a < b < c]In [94]: s.min(), s.max()Out[94]: ('a', 'c')
You can set categorical data to be ordered by using as_ordered() or unordered by using as_unordered(). These will by
default return a new object.
In [95]: s.cat.as_ordered()Out[95]:0 a3 a1 b2 cdtype: categoryCategories (3, object): [a < b < c]In [96]: s.cat.as_unordered()Out[96]:0 a3 a1 b2 cdtype: categoryCategories (3, object): [a, b, c]
Sorting will use the order defined by categories, not any lexical order present on the data type. This is even true for strings and numeric data:
In [97]: s = pd.Series([1, 2, 3, 1], dtype="category")In [98]: s = s.cat.set_categories([2, 3, 1], ordered=True)In [99]: sOut[99]:0 11 22 33 1dtype: categoryCategories (3, int64): [2 < 3 < 1]In [100]: s.sort_values(inplace=True)In [101]: sOut[101]:1 22 30 13 1dtype: categoryCategories (3, int64): [2 < 3 < 1]In [102]: s.min(), s.max()Out[102]: (2, 1)
Reordering
Reordering the categories is possible via the Categorical.reorder_categories() and
the Categorical.set_categories() methods. For Categorical.reorder_categories(), all
old categories must be included in the new categories and no new categories are allowed. This will
necessarily make the sort order the same as the categories order.
In [103]: s = pd.Series([1, 2, 3, 1], dtype="category")In [104]: s = s.cat.reorder_categories([2, 3, 1], ordered=True)In [105]: sOut[105]:0 11 22 33 1dtype: categoryCategories (3, int64): [2 < 3 < 1]In [106]: s.sort_values(inplace=True)In [107]: sOut[107]:1 22 30 13 1dtype: categoryCategories (3, int64): [2 < 3 < 1]In [108]: s.min(), s.max()Out[108]: (2, 1)
::: tip Note
Note the difference between assigning new categories and reordering the categories: the first
renames categories and therefore the individual values in the Series, but if the first
position was sorted last, the renamed value will still be sorted last. Reordering means that the
way values are sorted is different afterwards, but not that individual values in the
Series are changed.
:::
::: tip Note
If the Categorical is not ordered, Series.min() and Series.max() will raise
TypeError. Numeric operations like +, -, *, / and operations based on them
(e.g. Series.median(), which would need to compute the mean between two values if the length
of an array is even) do not work and raise a TypeError.
:::
Multi column sorting
A categorical dtyped column will participate in a multi-column sort in a similar manner to other columns.
The ordering of the categorical is determined by the categories of that column.
In [109]: dfs = pd.DataFrame({'A': pd.Categorical(list('bbeebbaa'),.....: categories=['e', 'a', 'b'],.....: ordered=True),.....: 'B': [1, 2, 1, 2, 2, 1, 2, 1]}).....:In [110]: dfs.sort_values(by=['A', 'B'])Out[110]:A B2 e 13 e 27 a 16 a 20 b 15 b 11 b 24 b 2
Reordering the categories changes a future sort.
In [111]: dfs['A'] = dfs['A'].cat.reorder_categories(['a', 'b', 'e'])In [112]: dfs.sort_values(by=['A', 'B'])Out[112]:A B7 a 16 a 20 b 15 b 11 b 24 b 22 e 13 e 2
Comparisons
Comparing categorical data with other objects is possible in three cases:
- Comparing equality (
==and!=) to a list-like object (list, Series, array, …) of the same length as the categorical data. - All comparisons (
==,!=,>,>=,<, and<=) of categorical data to another categorical Series, whenordered==Trueand the categories are the same. - All comparisons of a categorical data to a scalar.
All other comparisons, especially “non-equality” comparisons of two categoricals with different
categories or a categorical with any list-like object, will raise a TypeError.
::: tip Note
Any “non-equality” comparisons of categorical data with a Series, np.array, list or
categorical data with different categories or ordering will raise a TypeError because custom
categories ordering could be interpreted in two ways: one with taking into account the
ordering and one without.
:::
In [113]: cat = pd.Series([1, 2, 3]).astype(.....: CategoricalDtype([3, 2, 1], ordered=True).....: ).....:In [114]: cat_base = pd.Series([2, 2, 2]).astype(.....: CategoricalDtype([3, 2, 1], ordered=True).....: ).....:In [115]: cat_base2 = pd.Series([2, 2, 2]).astype(.....: CategoricalDtype(ordered=True).....: ).....:In [116]: catOut[116]:0 11 22 3dtype: categoryCategories (3, int64): [3 < 2 < 1]In [117]: cat_baseOut[117]:0 21 22 2dtype: categoryCategories (3, int64): [3 < 2 < 1]In [118]: cat_base2Out[118]:0 21 22 2dtype: categoryCategories (1, int64): [2]
Comparing to a categorical with the same categories and ordering or to a scalar works:
In [119]: cat > cat_baseOut[119]:0 True1 False2 Falsedtype: boolIn [120]: cat > 2Out[120]:0 True1 False2 Falsedtype: bool
Equality comparisons work with any list-like object of same length and scalars:
In [121]: cat == cat_baseOut[121]:0 False1 True2 Falsedtype: boolIn [122]: cat == np.array([1, 2, 3])Out[122]:0 True1 True2 Truedtype: boolIn [123]: cat == 2Out[123]:0 False1 True2 Falsedtype: bool
This doesn’t work because the categories are not the same:
In [124]: try:.....: cat > cat_base2.....: except TypeError as e:.....: print("TypeError:", str(e)).....:TypeError: Categoricals can only be compared if 'categories' are the same. Categories are different lengths
If you want to do a “non-equality” comparison of a categorical series with a list-like object which is not categorical data, you need to be explicit and convert the categorical data back to the original values:
In [125]: base = np.array([1, 2, 3])In [126]: try:.....: cat > base.....: except TypeError as e:.....: print("TypeError:", str(e)).....:TypeError: Cannot compare a Categorical for op __gt__ with type <class 'numpy.ndarray'>.If you want to compare values, use 'np.asarray(cat) <op> other'.In [127]: np.asarray(cat) > baseOut[127]: array([False, False, False])
When you compare two unordered categoricals with the same categories, the order is not considered:
In [128]: c1 = pd.Categorical(['a', 'b'], categories=['a', 'b'], ordered=False)In [129]: c2 = pd.Categorical(['a', 'b'], categories=['b', 'a'], ordered=False)In [130]: c1 == c2Out[130]: array([ True, True])
Operations
Apart from Series.min(), Series.max() and Series.mode(), the
following operations are possible with categorical data:
Series methods like Series.value_counts() will use all categories,
even if some categories are not present in the data:
In [131]: s = pd.Series(pd.Categorical(["a", "b", "c", "c"],.....: categories=["c", "a", "b", "d"])).....:In [132]: s.value_counts()Out[132]:c 2b 1a 1d 0dtype: int64
Groupby will also show “unused” categories:
In [133]: cats = pd.Categorical(["a", "b", "b", "b", "c", "c", "c"],.....: categories=["a", "b", "c", "d"]).....:In [134]: df = pd.DataFrame({"cats": cats, "values": [1, 2, 2, 2, 3, 4, 5]})In [135]: df.groupby("cats").mean()Out[135]:valuescatsa 1.0b 2.0c 4.0d NaNIn [136]: cats2 = pd.Categorical(["a", "a", "b", "b"], categories=["a", "b", "c"])In [137]: df2 = pd.DataFrame({"cats": cats2,.....: "B": ["c", "d", "c", "d"],.....: "values": [1, 2, 3, 4]}).....:In [138]: df2.groupby(["cats", "B"]).mean()Out[138]:valuescats Ba c 1.0d 2.0b c 3.0d 4.0c c NaNd NaN
Pivot tables:
In [139]: raw_cat = pd.Categorical(["a", "a", "b", "b"], categories=["a", "b", "c"])In [140]: df = pd.DataFrame({"A": raw_cat,.....: "B": ["c", "d", "c", "d"],.....: "values": [1, 2, 3, 4]}).....:In [141]: pd.pivot_table(df, values='values', index=['A', 'B'])Out[141]:valuesA Ba c 1d 2b c 3d 4
Data munging
The optimized pandas data access methods .loc, .iloc, .at, and .iat,
work as normal. The only difference is the return type (for getting) and
that only values already in categories can be assigned.
Getting
If the slicing operation returns either a DataFrame or a column of type
Series, the category dtype is preserved.
In [142]: idx = pd.Index(["h", "i", "j", "k", "l", "m", "n"])In [143]: cats = pd.Series(["a", "b", "b", "b", "c", "c", "c"],.....: dtype="category", index=idx).....:In [144]: values = [1, 2, 2, 2, 3, 4, 5]In [145]: df = pd.DataFrame({"cats": cats, "values": values}, index=idx)In [146]: df.iloc[2:4, :]Out[146]:cats valuesj b 2k b 2In [147]: df.iloc[2:4, :].dtypesOut[147]:cats categoryvalues int64dtype: objectIn [148]: df.loc["h":"j", "cats"]Out[148]:h ai bj bName: cats, dtype: categoryCategories (3, object): [a, b, c]In [149]: df[df["cats"] == "b"]Out[149]:cats valuesi b 2j b 2k b 2
An example where the category type is not preserved is if you take one single
row: the resulting Series is of dtype object:
# get the complete "h" row as a SeriesIn [150]: df.loc["h", :]Out[150]:cats avalues 1Name: h, dtype: object
Returning a single item from categorical data will also return the value, not a categorical of length “1”.
In [151]: df.iat[0, 0]Out[151]: 'a'In [152]: df["cats"].cat.categories = ["x", "y", "z"]In [153]: df.at["h", "cats"] # returns a stringOut[153]: 'x'
::: tip Note
The is in contrast to R’s factor function, where factor(c(1,2,3))[1]
returns a single value factor.
:::
To get a single value Series of type category, you pass in a list with
a single value:
In [154]: df.loc[["h"], "cats"]Out[154]:h xName: cats, dtype: categoryCategories (3, object): [x, y, z]
String and datetime accessors
The accessors .dt and .str will work if the s.cat.categories are of
an appropriate type:
In [155]: str_s = pd.Series(list('aabb'))In [156]: str_cat = str_s.astype('category')In [157]: str_catOut[157]:0 a1 a2 b3 bdtype: categoryCategories (2, object): [a, b]In [158]: str_cat.str.contains("a")Out[158]:0 True1 True2 False3 Falsedtype: boolIn [159]: date_s = pd.Series(pd.date_range('1/1/2015', periods=5))In [160]: date_cat = date_s.astype('category')In [161]: date_catOut[161]:0 2015-01-011 2015-01-022 2015-01-033 2015-01-044 2015-01-05dtype: categoryCategories (5, datetime64[ns]): [2015-01-01, 2015-01-02, 2015-01-03, 2015-01-04, 2015-01-05]In [162]: date_cat.dt.dayOut[162]:0 11 22 33 44 5dtype: int64
::: tip Note
The returned Series (or DataFrame) is of the same type as if you used the
.str. / .dt. on a Series of that type (and not of
type category!).
:::
That means, that the returned values from methods and properties on the accessors of a
Series and the returned values from methods and properties on the accessors of this
Series transformed to one of type category will be equal:
In [163]: ret_s = str_s.str.contains("a")In [164]: ret_cat = str_cat.str.contains("a")In [165]: ret_s.dtype == ret_cat.dtypeOut[165]: TrueIn [166]: ret_s == ret_catOut[166]:0 True1 True2 True3 Truedtype: bool
::: tip Note
The work is done on the categories and then a new Series is constructed. This has
some performance implication if you have a Series of type string, where lots of elements
are repeated (i.e. the number of unique elements in the Series is a lot smaller than the
length of the Series). In this case it can be faster to convert the original Series
to one of type category and use .str. or .dt. on that.
:::
Setting
Setting values in a categorical column (or Series) works as long as the
value is included in the categories:
In [167]: idx = pd.Index(["h", "i", "j", "k", "l", "m", "n"])In [168]: cats = pd.Categorical(["a", "a", "a", "a", "a", "a", "a"],.....: categories=["a", "b"]).....:In [169]: values = [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]In [170]: df = pd.DataFrame({"cats": cats, "values": values}, index=idx)In [171]: df.iloc[2:4, :] = [["b", 2], ["b", 2]]In [172]: dfOut[172]:cats valuesh a 1i a 1j b 2k b 2l a 1m a 1n a 1In [173]: try:.....: df.iloc[2:4, :] = [["c", 3], ["c", 3]].....: except ValueError as e:.....: print("ValueError:", str(e)).....:ValueError: Cannot setitem on a Categorical with a new category, set the categories first
Setting values by assigning categorical data will also check that the categories match:
In [174]: df.loc["j":"k", "cats"] = pd.Categorical(["a", "a"], categories=["a", "b"])In [175]: dfOut[175]:cats valuesh a 1i a 1j a 2k a 2l a 1m a 1n a 1In [176]: try:.....: df.loc["j":"k", "cats"] = pd.Categorical(["b", "b"],.....: categories=["a", "b", "c"]).....: except ValueError as e:.....: print("ValueError:", str(e)).....:ValueError: Cannot set a Categorical with another, without identical categories
Assigning a Categorical to parts of a column of other types will use the values:
In [177]: df = pd.DataFrame({"a": [1, 1, 1, 1, 1], "b": ["a", "a", "a", "a", "a"]})In [178]: df.loc[1:2, "a"] = pd.Categorical(["b", "b"], categories=["a", "b"])In [179]: df.loc[2:3, "b"] = pd.Categorical(["b", "b"], categories=["a", "b"])In [180]: dfOut[180]:a b0 1 a1 b a2 b b3 1 b4 1 aIn [181]: df.dtypesOut[181]:a objectb objectdtype: object
Merging
You can concat two DataFrames containing categorical data together,
but the categories of these categoricals need to be the same:
In [182]: cat = pd.Series(["a", "b"], dtype="category")In [183]: vals = [1, 2]In [184]: df = pd.DataFrame({"cats": cat, "vals": vals})In [185]: res = pd.concat([df, df])In [186]: resOut[186]:cats vals0 a 11 b 20 a 11 b 2In [187]: res.dtypesOut[187]:cats categoryvals int64dtype: object
In this case the categories are not the same, and therefore an error is raised:
In [188]: df_different = df.copy()In [189]: df_different["cats"].cat.categories = ["c", "d"]In [190]: try:.....: pd.concat([df, df_different]).....: except ValueError as e:.....: print("ValueError:", str(e)).....:
The same applies to df.append(df_different).
See also the section on merge dtypes for notes about preserving merge dtypes and performance.
Unioning
New in version 0.19.0.
If you want to combine categoricals that do not necessarily have the same
categories, the union_categoricals() function will
combine a list-like of categoricals. The new categories will be the union of
the categories being combined.
In [191]: from pandas.api.types import union_categoricalsIn [192]: a = pd.Categorical(["b", "c"])In [193]: b = pd.Categorical(["a", "b"])In [194]: union_categoricals([a, b])Out[194]:[b, c, a, b]Categories (3, object): [b, c, a]
By default, the resulting categories will be ordered as
they appear in the data. If you want the categories to
be lexsorted, use sort_categories=True argument.
In [195]: union_categoricals([a, b], sort_categories=True)Out[195]:[b, c, a, b]Categories (3, object): [a, b, c]
union_categoricals also works with the “easy” case of combining two
categoricals of the same categories and order information
(e.g. what you could also append for).
In [196]: a = pd.Categorical(["a", "b"], ordered=True)In [197]: b = pd.Categorical(["a", "b", "a"], ordered=True)In [198]: union_categoricals([a, b])Out[198]:[a, b, a, b, a]Categories (2, object): [a < b]
The below raises TypeError because the categories are ordered and not identical.
In [1]: a = pd.Categorical(["a", "b"], ordered=True)In [2]: b = pd.Categorical(["a", "b", "c"], ordered=True)In [3]: union_categoricals([a, b])Out[3]:TypeError: to union ordered Categoricals, all categories must be the same
New in version 0.20.0.
Ordered categoricals with different categories or orderings can be combined by
using the ignore_ordered=True argument.
In [199]: a = pd.Categorical(["a", "b", "c"], ordered=True)In [200]: b = pd.Categorical(["c", "b", "a"], ordered=True)In [201]: union_categoricals([a, b], ignore_order=True)Out[201]:[a, b, c, c, b, a]Categories (3, object): [a, b, c]
union_categoricals() also works with a
CategoricalIndex, or Series containing categorical data, but note that
the resulting array will always be a plain Categorical:
In [202]: a = pd.Series(["b", "c"], dtype='category')In [203]: b = pd.Series(["a", "b"], dtype='category')In [204]: union_categoricals([a, b])Out[204]:[b, c, a, b]Categories (3, object): [b, c, a]
::: tip Note
union_categoricals may recode the integer codes for categories
when combining categoricals. This is likely what you want,
but if you are relying on the exact numbering of the categories, be
aware.
In [205]: c1 = pd.Categorical(["b", "c"])In [206]: c2 = pd.Categorical(["a", "b"])In [207]: c1Out[207]:[b, c]Categories (2, object): [b, c]# "b" is coded to 0In [208]: c1.codesOut[208]: array([0, 1], dtype=int8)In [209]: c2Out[209]:[a, b]Categories (2, object): [a, b]# "b" is coded to 1In [210]: c2.codesOut[210]: array([0, 1], dtype=int8)In [211]: c = union_categoricals([c1, c2])In [212]: cOut[212]:[b, c, a, b]Categories (3, object): [b, c, a]# "b" is coded to 0 throughout, same as c1, different from c2In [213]: c.codesOut[213]: array([0, 1, 2, 0], dtype=int8)
:::
Concatenation
This section describes concatenations specific to category dtype. See Concatenating objects for general description.
By default, Series or DataFrame concatenation which contains the same categories
results in category dtype, otherwise results in object dtype.
Use .astype or union_categoricals to get category result.
# same categoriesIn [214]: s1 = pd.Series(['a', 'b'], dtype='category')In [215]: s2 = pd.Series(['a', 'b', 'a'], dtype='category')In [216]: pd.concat([s1, s2])Out[216]:0 a1 b0 a1 b2 adtype: categoryCategories (2, object): [a, b]# different categoriesIn [217]: s3 = pd.Series(['b', 'c'], dtype='category')In [218]: pd.concat([s1, s3])Out[218]:0 a1 b0 b1 cdtype: objectIn [219]: pd.concat([s1, s3]).astype('category')Out[219]:0 a1 b0 b1 cdtype: categoryCategories (3, object): [a, b, c]In [220]: union_categoricals([s1.array, s3.array])Out[220]:[a, b, b, c]Categories (3, object): [a, b, c]
Following table summarizes the results of Categoricals related concatenations.
| arg1 | arg2 | result |
|---|---|---|
| category | category (identical categories) | category |
| category | category (different categories, both not ordered) | object (dtype is inferred) |
| category | category (different categories, either one is ordered) | object (dtype is inferred) |
| category | not category | object (dtype is inferred) |
Getting data in/out
You can write data that contains category dtypes to a HDFStore.
See here for an example and caveats.
It is also possible to write data to and reading data from Stata format files. See here for an example and caveats.
Writing to a CSV file will convert the data, effectively removing any information about the categorical (categories and ordering). So if you read back the CSV file you have to convert the relevant columns back to category and assign the right categories and categories ordering.
In [221]: import ioIn [222]: s = pd.Series(pd.Categorical(['a', 'b', 'b', 'a', 'a', 'd']))# rename the categoriesIn [223]: s.cat.categories = ["very good", "good", "bad"]# reorder the categories and add missing categoriesIn [224]: s = s.cat.set_categories(["very bad", "bad", "medium", "good", "very good"])In [225]: df = pd.DataFrame({"cats": s, "vals": [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]})In [226]: csv = io.StringIO()In [227]: df.to_csv(csv)In [228]: df2 = pd.read_csv(io.StringIO(csv.getvalue()))In [229]: df2.dtypesOut[229]:Unnamed: 0 int64cats objectvals int64dtype: objectIn [230]: df2["cats"]Out[230]:0 very good1 good2 good3 very good4 very good5 badName: cats, dtype: object# Redo the categoryIn [231]: df2["cats"] = df2["cats"].astype("category")In [232]: df2["cats"].cat.set_categories(["very bad", "bad", "medium",.....: "good", "very good"],.....: inplace=True).....:In [233]: df2.dtypesOut[233]:Unnamed: 0 int64cats categoryvals int64dtype: objectIn [234]: df2["cats"]Out[234]:0 very good1 good2 good3 very good4 very good5 badName: cats, dtype: categoryCategories (5, object): [very bad, bad, medium, good, very good]
The same holds for writing to a SQL database with to_sql.
Missing data
pandas primarily uses the value np.nan to represent missing data. It is by default not included in computations. See the Missing Data section.
Missing values should not be included in the Categorical’s categories,
only in the values.
Instead, it is understood that NaN is different, and is always a possibility.
When working with the Categorical’s codes, missing values will always have
a code of -1.
In [235]: s = pd.Series(["a", "b", np.nan, "a"], dtype="category")# only two categoriesIn [236]: sOut[236]:0 a1 b2 NaN3 adtype: categoryCategories (2, object): [a, b]In [237]: s.cat.codesOut[237]:0 01 12 -13 0dtype: int8
Methods for working with missing data, e.g. isna(), fillna(),
dropna(), all work normally:
In [238]: s = pd.Series(["a", "b", np.nan], dtype="category")In [239]: sOut[239]:0 a1 b2 NaNdtype: categoryCategories (2, object): [a, b]In [240]: pd.isna(s)Out[240]:0 False1 False2 Truedtype: boolIn [241]: s.fillna("a")Out[241]:0 a1 b2 adtype: categoryCategories (2, object): [a, b]
Differences to R’s factor
The following differences to R’s factor functions can be observed:
- R’s levels are named categories.
- R’s levels are always of type string, while categories in pandas can be of any dtype.
- It’s not possible to specify labels at creation time. Use
s.cat.rename_categories(new_labels)afterwards. - In contrast to R’s factor function, using categorical data as the sole input to create a new categorical series will not remove unused categories but create a new categorical series which is equal to the passed in one!
- R allows for missing values to be included in its levels (pandas’ categories). Pandas does not allow NaN categories, but missing values can still be in the values.
Gotchas
Memory usage
The memory usage of a Categorical is proportional to the number of categories plus the length of the data. In contrast,
an object dtype is a constant times the length of the data.
In [242]: s = pd.Series(['foo', 'bar'] * 1000)# object dtypeIn [243]: s.nbytesOut[243]: 16000# category dtypeIn [244]: s.astype('category').nbytesOut[244]: 2016
::: tip Note
If the number of categories approaches the length of the data, the Categorical will use nearly the same or
more memory than an equivalent object dtype representation.
In [245]: s = pd.Series(['foo%04d' % i for i in range(2000)])# object dtypeIn [246]: s.nbytesOut[246]: 16000# category dtypeIn [247]: s.astype('category').nbytesOut[247]: 20000
:::
Categorical is not a numpy array
Currently, categorical data and the underlying Categorical is implemented as a Python
object and not as a low-level NumPy array dtype. This leads to some problems.
NumPy itself doesn’t know about the new dtype:
In [248]: try:.....: np.dtype("category").....: except TypeError as e:.....: print("TypeError:", str(e)).....:TypeError: data type "category" not understoodIn [249]: dtype = pd.Categorical(["a"]).dtypeIn [250]: try:.....: np.dtype(dtype).....: except TypeError as e:.....: print("TypeError:", str(e)).....:TypeError: data type not understood
Dtype comparisons work:
In [251]: dtype == np.str_Out[251]: FalseIn [252]: np.str_ == dtypeOut[252]: False
To check if a Series contains Categorical data, use hasattr(s, 'cat'):
In [253]: hasattr(pd.Series(['a'], dtype='category'), 'cat')Out[253]: TrueIn [254]: hasattr(pd.Series(['a']), 'cat')Out[254]: False
Using NumPy functions on a Series of type category should not work as Categoricals
are not numeric data (even in the case that .categories is numeric).
In [255]: s = pd.Series(pd.Categorical([1, 2, 3, 4]))In [256]: try:.....: np.sum(s).....: except TypeError as e:.....: print("TypeError:", str(e)).....:TypeError: Categorical cannot perform the operation sum
::: tip Note
If such a function works, please file a bug at https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas!
:::
dtype in apply
Pandas currently does not preserve the dtype in apply functions: If you apply along rows you get
a Series of object dtype (same as getting a row -> getting one element will return a
basic type) and applying along columns will also convert to object. NaN values are unaffected.
You can use fillna to handle missing values before applying a function.
In [257]: df = pd.DataFrame({"a": [1, 2, 3, 4],.....: "b": ["a", "b", "c", "d"],.....: "cats": pd.Categorical([1, 2, 3, 2])}).....:In [258]: df.apply(lambda row: type(row["cats"]), axis=1)Out[258]:0 <class 'int'>1 <class 'int'>2 <class 'int'>3 <class 'int'>dtype: objectIn [259]: df.apply(lambda col: col.dtype, axis=0)Out[259]:a int64b objectcats categorydtype: object
Categorical index
CategoricalIndex is a type of index that is useful for supporting
indexing with duplicates. This is a container around a Categorical
and allows efficient indexing and storage of an index with a large number of duplicated elements.
See the advanced indexing docs for a more detailed
explanation.
Setting the index will create a CategoricalIndex:
In [260]: cats = pd.Categorical([1, 2, 3, 4], categories=[4, 2, 3, 1])In [261]: strings = ["a", "b", "c", "d"]In [262]: values = [4, 2, 3, 1]In [263]: df = pd.DataFrame({"strings": strings, "values": values}, index=cats)In [264]: df.indexOut[264]: CategoricalIndex([1, 2, 3, 4], categories=[4, 2, 3, 1], ordered=False, dtype='category')# This now sorts by the categories orderIn [265]: df.sort_index()Out[265]:strings values4 d 12 b 23 c 31 a 4
Side effects
Constructing a Series from a Categorical will not copy the input
Categorical. This means that changes to the Series will in most cases
change the original Categorical:
In [266]: cat = pd.Categorical([1, 2, 3, 10], categories=[1, 2, 3, 4, 10])In [267]: s = pd.Series(cat, name="cat")In [268]: catOut[268]:[1, 2, 3, 10]Categories (5, int64): [1, 2, 3, 4, 10]In [269]: s.iloc[0:2] = 10In [270]: catOut[270]:[10, 10, 3, 10]Categories (5, int64): [1, 2, 3, 4, 10]In [271]: df = pd.DataFrame(s)In [272]: df["cat"].cat.categories = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]In [273]: catOut[273]:[5, 5, 3, 5]Categories (5, int64): [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Use copy=True to prevent such a behaviour or simply don’t reuse Categoricals:
In [274]: cat = pd.Categorical([1, 2, 3, 10], categories=[1, 2, 3, 4, 10])In [275]: s = pd.Series(cat, name="cat", copy=True)In [276]: catOut[276]:[1, 2, 3, 10]Categories (5, int64): [1, 2, 3, 4, 10]In [277]: s.iloc[0:2] = 10In [278]: catOut[278]:[1, 2, 3, 10]Categories (5, int64): [1, 2, 3, 4, 10]
::: tip Note
This also happens in some cases when you supply a NumPy array instead of a Categorical:
using an int array (e.g. np.array([1,2,3,4])) will exhibit the same behavior, while using
a string array (e.g. np.array(["a","b","c","a"])) will not.
:::
